From The Palm Beach Post: Florida lawmakers did one thing worth celebrating in this year’s legislative session: They approved, at long last, a law that protects residents from SLAPPs — Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation. Two champions deserve special credit for the success of the anti-SLAPP campaign: The Florida Press Association (FPA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).
On the Treasure Coast, where residents have spent millions over the last few decades defending themselves against corporations and deep-pocket developers who tried to shut them up, the law offers hope.
A SLAPP suit purports to right a wrong but actually is brought to silence critics — often residents who speak out at public meetings or write letters to newspaper editors. It also can hamper movies, TV, radio and newspapers.
Previously, Florida law didn’t allow governments to sue individuals in retaliation for exercising their right to participate in governmental activities. Now the new law also protects residents from being victimized by SLAPPs filed either by private persons or corporations. It protects both speech made before a government entity and speech in connection with a play, movie, TV program, radio broadcast, audiovisual work, book, magazine article, musical work or news report.
The law is too late to help St. Lucie County residents who battled a corporation over a proposed bridge to Hutchinson Island. Or Martin residents who fought developer Bill Reily’s Pitchford’s Landing and Lake Point rockpit developers for the right to speak out in opposition to those projects.
But the law is a huge step forward for the future.
Sam Morley, general counsel for the FPA, and Ben Sheffner, vice president for legal affairs at the MPA, praise two lawmakers: Sen. David Simmons, R-Altamonte Springs; and Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Coral Springs.
Martin environmental lawyer Virginia Sherlock worked with the FPA several years ago to craft language for an anti-SLAPP law. But lawmakers in Martin and others statewide failed to get behind it.
“We’ve been working with Sen. Simmons the last couple of sessions,” Morely said.
“Sen. Simmons took a really good lead,” Morley said, “educating everybody, particularly other senators, on the issue.”
“We’re very happy with how things turned out,” said Sheffner, whose group represents six big movie studios. “California has strong anti-SLAPP legislation in place, and we all use it frequently. Now we’re making an effort to get new anti-SLAPP legislation passed around the country.”
Sheffner said little opposition surfaced as lawyers from 20th Century Fox and other studios spoke to lawmakers. They sold the anti-SLAPP law as the way to create a better legal environment in Florida for film and TV producers, as well as a big help to the press, TV stations and to little counties such as Martin, where developers use SLAPPS to smack down opponents.
Strong anti-SLAPP law “makes Florida a better place to do business,” Sheffner said. “No one should have to spend years in courts to exercise their constitutional rights” to free speech.
Martin residents who have suffered the financial and emotional consequences of SLAPPs didn’t anticipate help would come from such unexpected allies.
Now all that’s needed is a way to address SLAPPs still in the courts that were filed before the anti-SLAPP law took effect. Former county commissioner Maggy Hurchalla, Martin County and the South Florida Water Management District still are involved in SLAPPs with Lake Point developers. See www.slappmaggy.com/ andhttps://sites.google.com/site/maggyconnectsdots/ for more on those issues.
The 2015 legislative session was so loaded with disasters — such as Gov. Rick Scott and lawmakers’ arrogant misuse of money residents voted to spend saving environmental lands — that few noticed the quiet passage of the anti-SLAPP law. Thanks to the two lawmakers, the FPA and the MPA, it’s a reality.
Sally Swartz is a former member of The Post Editorial Board. Her e-mail address is sdswartz42@att.net